Acer Aspire E5-574G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-574G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Zoro_SL
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160215
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 17:08
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 55.1
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 89.9
38% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 142
17% 132 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 100C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4599
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.33% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 2.6
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.33%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
128gb SATA FLASH DRIVE 128GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SFPS855A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 14 11 8.8 9.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 80%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
128GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 54 50 48 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 54.7
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 51.2
36% 49.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 0114 SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 38%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 18 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO71EC
Typical Aspire E5-574G Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-574G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback