HP ProBook 440 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 440 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8977
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230626
Uptime5 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 09:44
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.4% Poor
Memory 21.8
1-Core 53.6
2-Core 90
30% 55.1 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 222
24% 189 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX570
HP(103C 89A3) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2908
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 23
Reflection 33.6
Parallax 11.7
19% 22.8 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 22.8
16% 18.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00BH1 256GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 139 133 113 123 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 608
Write 431
Mixed 376
SusWrite 158
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 18.9
63% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 74.1
DQ Mixed 146
107% 144 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 200%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 7.3
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 206
19% 206 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 35 8 60 14" 1536 793 AUO559C
Typical ProBook 440 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 440 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback