Fujitsu LIFEBOOK UH574

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK UH574  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB34
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 08:49
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 13.3
2-Core 49.5
31% 43.7 Pts
4-Core 93.8
8-Core 89.3
12% 91.6 Pts
64-Core 45
3% 45 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 1812) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4568
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 3.9
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Bodi 512GB 512GB
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3105A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 93 155 165 175 167 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.3% Below average
Read 263
Write 254
Mixed 161
SusWrite 157
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 4.7
20% 8.23 MB/s
DQ Read 80.4
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 11.4
32% 66.2 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
21.8% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 6.1
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 227
18% 227 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 25 8 60 13.2" 1280 720 LGD0354
Typical LIFEBOOK UH574 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK UH574

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $482
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback