Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 03:26
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 155
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 492
43% 365 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39D0) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9125
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.8% Poor
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 36.8
31% 37.9 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 25.7
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KDA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 492
Write 216
Mixed 498
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 42.3
127% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 610
DQ Write 79.1
DQ Mixed 173
170% 287 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 141%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
45GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 108 104 106 103 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 120
Write 104
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 100
71% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
152% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 21.8
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 17.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 33 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0590
Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 6,998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback