Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics77.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 22:59
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 853
87% 706 Pts
64-Core 1,101
68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
EVGA(3842 1665) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.2% Very good
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 94.8
Parallax 87.4
80% 93.5 fps
MRender 97.4
Gravity 91.1
Splatting 78.3
72% 88.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,078
Write 2087
Mixed 1,824
446% 1,996 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 82
293% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,107
DQ Write 822
DQ Mixed 962
720% 964 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 271%
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB
16GB free
Firmware: SBFA1a.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 109 73 107 77 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 355
Write 103
Mixed 94.1
SusWrite 122
37% 169 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 17.3
69% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 26.7
DQ Mixed 24.8
19% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E82-3200D F4-3000C16-8GVRB 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 31.4
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 31
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 165 23.5" 1280 720 AUS242A ASUS VG249Q1A
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback