Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 2340 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 00:39
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 155
2-Core 306
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 856
80% 669 Pts
64-Core 1,102
68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
EVGA(3842 1665) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.3% Very good
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 96.1
Parallax 88
80% 94.2 fps
MRender 97.3
Gravity 91.6
Splatting 78.3
72% 89.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 785 287 382 317 357 331 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,721
Write 1,557
Mixed 1,512
SusWrite 410
291% 1,300 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 78
272% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,103
DQ Write 812
DQ Mixed 952
713% 956 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 221%
Great: 271%
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB
51GB free
Firmware: SBFA1a.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 111 111 108 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 372
Write 107
Mixed 196
SusWrite 110
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 44
153% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 131
136% 221 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E82-3200D F4-3000C16-8GVRB 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.4
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 30.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 31.8
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 16 165 23.5" 1280 720 AUS242A ASUS VG249Q1A
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback