MSI MS-1763

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemMicro-Star GT70 2PE
MotherboardMSI MS-1763  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '18 at 04:09
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 190
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 410
44% 353 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1105) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.18% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 7.16
4% 13.5 fps
MRender 8.67
Gravity 2.67
Splatting 8.61
6% 6.65 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.18%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
605GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 109
Write 96.3
Mixed 92.4
75% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.19
60% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 75%
Kingston DT 101 G2 4GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
4.91% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 5.22
Mixed 7.06
11% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.69
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.008
18% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.91%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 1311 NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1763 Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1763

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback