Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte H270-HD3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170424
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '23 at 19:27
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 119 2-Core 235 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 430 55% 418 Pts	64-Core 425 26% 425 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 3FE4) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44.1% Average	Lighting 56.9 Reflection 58.4 Parallax 50 46% 55.1 fps	MRender 43.9 Gravity 54 Splatting 47.7 40% 48.5 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84 21,990 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 58 45 57 35 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 316 Write 109 Mixed 142 SusWrite 53.2 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 17.9 73% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 19.6 57% 122 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 71%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 832GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 149 152 153 154 157 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 148 Mixed 92.9 SusWrite 152 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 32GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 23.3 73% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 28.3 SC Mixed 22.2 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	41	5	60	24"	1280 720	DELA08B DELL S2440L

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	269x
Core i5-7500Intel $62Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	171x
Core i7-7700KIntel $235Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	139x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	140x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	99x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x

SSD
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	39x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	37x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	20x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	29x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	28x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $415

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16