Panasonic FZG1-3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPanasonic FZG1-3  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic FZG1-3
Memory4.6 GB free of 8.01562 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 18:50
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5300U
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 52
2-Core 110
45% 74.7 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 176
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 5.7
4% 4.47 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4
Splatting 5.8
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE256HMHP-000MV 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT42M0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 218 222 209 215 229 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 374
Write 236
Mixed 164
SusWrite 219
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 20.9
84% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 72.9
97% 177 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FZG1-3 5CTSA61280 0032 FZG1-3 5CTSA61280 56GB
1600, 1600, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 13.7
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.9
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 25 60 10.1" 1296 800 MEI96A2 G1_FHD
Typical FZG1-3 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic FZG1-3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback