Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '23 at 14:14
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53 4,803 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 79 2-Core 157 62% 106 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 513 49% 404 Pts	64-Core 757 47% 757 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Lighting 20.1 Reflection 24.4 Parallax 19.7 16% 21.4 fps	MRender 24.6 Gravity 21.8 Splatting 15.9 16% 20.8 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB 7,332 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0210A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 121 166 86 69 71 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 1,190 Write 597 Mixed 672 SusWrite 122 142% 645 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 24.7 131% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 380 DQ Mixed 216 181% 255 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 867GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 196 195 197 193 196 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 211 Write 183 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 186 119% 164 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CHD- 2x8GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	46.8% Average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 10.6 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 79 51% 79 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	48	14	60	23.8"	1280 720	MSI30A1 MSI MP242

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

CPU
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	102x
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	62x
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples	37x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	30x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples	26x

SSD
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	12x
SSD 256GBTammuzBench 95%, 266 samples	11x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	10x

RAM
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	18x
36KSF2G72PZ-1 1x16GBMicronBench 28%, 138 samples	15x
36JSZF51272PZ 4x4GBMicronBench 66%, 485 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $92

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16