Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 11:53
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 71.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 246
80% 148 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 955
85% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,604
99% 1,604 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.7% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 133
Parallax 177
87% 139 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 120
Splatting 83.3
82% 103 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,688
Write 1,404
Mixed 851
291% 1,314 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 62.4
203% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 956
DQ Write 807
DQ Mixed 864
652% 876 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
391GB free
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,142
Write 989
Mixed 775
215% 969 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 59.5
190% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 1,099
DQ Write 934
DQ Mixed 966
737% 1,000 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$280
6.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 150
Write 150
Mixed 82.4
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.4
320% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 138%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$280
6TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 185
Write 167
Mixed 91.8
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.1
288% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 138%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$280
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 122
Write 126
Mixed 73.9
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.5
321% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 138%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$280
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 127
Write 122
Mixed 72.6
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.3
306% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 138%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$280
631GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 150
Write 158
Mixed 83.1
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.4
323% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 138%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
465GB free, PID a00d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 41.1
Write 41.7
Mixed 24.7
45% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2933 C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 52.9
MC Mixed 33.3
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 10.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 174%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 32" 2560 1377 BNQ8025 BenQ PD3200U
Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback