Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151224
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '23 at 10:52
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 880K-$105 8,721 User benchmarks, average bench 46% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Memory 55 1-Core 67 2-Core 128 48% 83.3 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 176 23% 172 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.7% Poor	Lighting 37.5 Reflection 42.4 Parallax 39 31% 39.6 fps	MRender 37.1 Gravity 39.3 Splatting 28.3 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 860GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 320 319 350 349 338 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 380 Write 350 Mixed 319 SusWrite 332 78% 345 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 47.1 4K Mixed 34 110% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 35.2 DQ Write 77.5 DQ Mixed 46 38% 52.9 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 133%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB 39,407 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 898GB free Firmware: SC23 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 154 152 156 163 153 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Read 147 Write 145 Mixed 67.2 SusWrite 155 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB 450 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	34.8% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 14.7 36% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 10 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	11	71	59	0	84.6"	1280 720	SAM712A SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-F2A68HM-HD2 Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 - $105

CPU
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	59x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	37x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	25x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	17x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	8x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	9x
CT102464BD160 2x8GBCrucialBench 39%, 720 samples	9x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $218

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16