Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
9 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-UD5  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 10:47
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 127
58% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 284
31% 245 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Asus(1043 0513) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 22.3
13% 21.6 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 24.7
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
733GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 70 76 69 56 58 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.8% Below average
Read 142
Write 48.2
Mixed 148
SusWrite 65
23% 101 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 22.3
4K Mixed 15.9
52% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 94.7
DQ Mixed 64
61% 95.8 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 125%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
183GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 75 69 55 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.4% Poor
Read 154
Write 146
Mixed 113
SusWrite 65.1
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 21.2
4K Mixed 6.8
36% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 93.3
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 53.4
55% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 86%
Corsair Force 3 240GB-$232
84GB free
Firmware: 5.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 50 54 53 52 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 99.2
Write 65.8
Mixed 82
SusWrite 52
17% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 8.2
29% 8.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 67%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
160GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 68 74 67 56 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 64
62% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
321GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 73 67 56 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 85.9
Write 98.2
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 63.7
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
234GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 60 62 59 54 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 77.1
Write 63.2
Mixed 44
SusWrite 57.1
44% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST31000525SV 1TB-$155
341GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 74 68 56 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 93.7
Write 70.2
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 63.7
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 70%
Compact Flash Card 4GB
2GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 18 18 18 22 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 56.5
Write 17.9
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 18.5
26% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 15%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
756GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 20 17 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 50.7
Write 17.6
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 16.5
29% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
19% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.9% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 16
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 11.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 46 165 34" 1280 720 PHLC298 34M1C5500VA
Typical GA-EX58-UD5 Builds (Compare 479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback