Asrock 890FX Deluxe5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 890FX Deluxe5  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '18 at 01:12
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 124
55% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 382
38% 308 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 39.6
Parallax 53
36% 45.5 fps
MRender 53.9
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 36.9
37% 47 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 385
Write 264
Mixed 233
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 14.1
80% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 37.5
DQ Mixed 17.2
18% 28.4 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 118%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 64.6
Write 68.1
Mixed 86.8
56% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.25
75% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 87%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
243GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 77.9
Write 71.8
Mixed 27.1
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.42
121% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
115GB free
Firmware: 1AA01110 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 59.1
Write 76.6
Mixed 55.4
48% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.49
114% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.4% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 890FX Deluxe5 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 890FX Deluxe5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback