HP Laptop

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89BC
Memory0.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230704
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 01:54
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-1155G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 66.8
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 236
69% 131 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 601
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 89BC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 21.3
13% 19.4 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 15.7
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 862
Write 780
Mixed 760
179% 800 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 50.3
179% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 404
292% 380 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 189%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M8FF 20GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 4% 24 107 59 60 27" 1280 720 DELA19E DELL S2721DS
Typical Laptop Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback