HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z640 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212A
Memory14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 18:51
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 159
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 652
58% 488 Pts
64-Core 777
48% 777 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Nvidia(10DE 0927) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.6
1% 0.77 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$55
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 55 97 98 39 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 149
Write 138
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 61.5
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965690-002.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.2% Good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 22.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 16 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7706 LG HDR 4K
Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback