HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111110
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '23 at 18:21
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 90 2-Core 176 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 294 38% 286 Pts	64-Core 295 18% 295 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Lighting 20.9 Reflection 18.5 Parallax 22.9 17% 20.8 fps	MRender 24.9 Gravity 22.9 Splatting 16.9 17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 229 227 246 248 248 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.5% Good	Read 245 Write 225 Mixed 207 SusWrite 228 51% 226 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 56.4 4K Mixed 31.8 110% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 172 134% 185 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 41GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 231 229 247 249 248 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	74.3% Very good	Read 241 Write 230 Mixed 224 SusWrite 229 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 41.2 134% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 190 143% 191 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 128%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 96GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 60 59 61 58 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 69 Write 71 Mixed 54 SusWrite 58.6 47% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 145GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 110 109 115 116 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	72% Very good	Read 143 Write 139 Mixed 70.6 SusWrite 108 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 230% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905402-665.A00LF 4x4GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	50.2% Above average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	24.1"	1280 720	ENC2799 EV2456

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,776 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	687x
Core i7-2600Intel $166Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	599x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	318x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	143x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	56x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16