Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201103
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '23 at 16:45
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	62%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	32.6% Below average	Memory 28.5 1-Core 107 2-Core 136 49% 90.4 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 230 29% 219 Pts	64-Core 48.8 3% 48.8 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Lighting 43 Reflection 40.8 Parallax 38.7 35% 40.8 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 41.5 Splatting 27.4 28% 35.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT2000P3SSD8 2TB 10,674 User benchmarks, average bench 287% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: P9CR30A SusWrite @10s intervals: 1524 1879 2037 2055 1997 2109 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 1,429 Write 1,459 Mixed 1,172 SusWrite 1,933 339% 1,498 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 82.8 4K Mixed 47.4 158% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 965 DQ Write 519 DQ Mixed 808 583% 764 MB/s
Poor: 117% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 417%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS6266.C4FJ 2x4GB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 24.6 MC Mixed 17.8 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 9.5 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	53	60	27"	1280 720	HPN354B HP 27fw

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,913 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	335x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	285x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	227x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	193x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	173x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	165x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	66x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	59x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	61x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16