HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 15:38
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
60% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 165
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 271
35% 264 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 20.8
17% 20.1 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 17.1
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 174 180 181 177 183 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.5% Above average
Read 212
Write 207
Mixed 180
SusWrite 172
44% 193 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 25.1
88% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 167
131% 181 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
40GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 204 213 217 212 207 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.9% Good
Read 245
Write 230
Mixed 226
SusWrite 205
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 37.9
125% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 192
145% 194 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
96GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 61 60 58 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 72.4
Write 70.2
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 59.1
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
145GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 113 117 116 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 144
Write 141
Mixed 75
SusWrite 111
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-665.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 46 60 24.1" 1280 720 ENC2799 EV2456
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,776 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback