Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '23 at 15:10
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$186 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 85.4 1-Core 75.7 2-Core 140 62% 100 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 254 32% 241 Pts	64-Core 309 19% 309 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 360D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 165 Reflection 177 Parallax 169 134% 170 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 163 Splatting 117 110% 137 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS2 50G2B0A-00SM50 250GB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: X611 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 66 71 54 59 68 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.3% Average	Read 198 Write 157 Mixed 175 SusWrite 66.9 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 27.1 96% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 104 78% 105 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 94%
WDC WDS2 50G2B0A-00SM50 250GB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 231GB free Firmware: X611 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 163 157 182 184 184 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 331 Write 204 Mixed 204 SusWrite 173 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 30.8 100% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 81.6 69% 99.7 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 94%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 416GB free Firmware: 401020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 360 355 416 421 424 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Read 403 Write 423 Mixed 330 SusWrite 398 88% 388 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 35.4 110% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 221 199% 304 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 117%
Hitachi TOURO Mobile 500GB 610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 117GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 30 30 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Read 55.7 Write 26.7 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 29.1 25% 34.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 58%
ST310003 33AS 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 329GB free, PID 0951 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 56.3 Write 25.5 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 19.2 36% 30.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.9 52% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 20%
ST375063 0AS 750GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 288GB free, PID 1019 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 20 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 55.4 Write 26 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 19.3 36% 30.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.8 42% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905584-023.A00LF 4x4GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 15.8 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 79.3 50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	56	30	60	27"	1280 720	SAM0C5D S27E590

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	446x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	358x
Core i7-2600Intel $186Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	200x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	118x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	96x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	35x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16