HP EliteDesk 800 G2 DM 35W

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 DM 35W  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8055
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160428
Uptime5 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 14:37
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 84
2-Core 171
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 302
40% 300 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8055) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.21% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.77 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 0.2
2% 3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Go-Infinity 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1021A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 116 229 77 62 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 422
Write 368
Mixed 358
SusWrite 114
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 16.1
76% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 20.6
DQ Mixed 24.1
28% 50.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 173%
WD Elements 25A1 1.5TB
131GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 65 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 92.4
Write 93.9
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 65.4
100% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] BLS8G4S26BFSDK.8FD - [0x4304] RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.7% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.1
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 79.1
50% 79.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 26" 1280 720 XXX0000 TV
Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 DM 35W Builds (Compare 1,008 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 DM 35W

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback