Lenovo 82B5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82B5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220414
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 04:13
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.4% Terrible
Memory 6.81
1-Core 13.3
2-Core 25.8
8% 15.3 Pts
4-Core 42.9
8-Core 71
7% 57 Pts
64-Core 76.8
5% 76.8 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 7.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Legend(17AA 3A43) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.19
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.3% Below average
Lighting 34.6
Reflection 47.9
Parallax 44.4
28% 42.3 fps
MRender 55.7
Gravity 44.1
Splatting 40.1
37% 46.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPITJ512VME2OWD 512GB
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.3C1908
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 392 421 411 422 438 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 600
Write 527
Mixed 495
SusWrite 413
114% 509 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 9.3
29% 9.1 MB/s
DQ Read 75.3
DQ Write 48.6
DQ Mixed 60.6
46% 61.5 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 262%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
526GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 106 107 105 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 66.6
Write 92.3
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 107
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
87% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston LV32D4S2S8HD-8 Adata 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 7.3
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 425
9% 425 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOB78D
Typical 82B5 Builds (Compare 1,504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 82B5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback