Asus X55C

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus X55C (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X55C
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130109
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '23 at 23:43
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	71%

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2328M 7,778 User benchmarks, average bench 47% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Memory 67.9 1-Core 30.4 2-Core 48.1 35% 48.8 Pts	4-Core 59.2 8-Core 65.9 8% 62.6 Pts	64-Core 71.5 4% 71.5 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 4000 128 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 14C7) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.6 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 0.5 1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 70 42 44 13 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Read 399 Write 327 Mixed 176 SusWrite 64.6 54% 242 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 2 19% 6.6 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 54 DQ Mixed 16.2 19% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 11.1 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	27	21	60	15.5"	1280 720	CMO1592

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X55C Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X55C

CPU
Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples	64x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	18x
Pentium B980IntelBench 46%, 3,640 samples	9x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	64x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	24x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	9x

SSD
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	3x

RAM
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 26%, 5,316 samples	41x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GBElpidaBench 43%, 67 samples	3x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GBElpidaBench 43%, 107 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 5% - Terrible

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16