Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170515
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '23 at 22:01
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Memory 69.8 1-Core 106 2-Core 199 70% 125 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 572 57% 462 Pts	64-Core 680 42% 680 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.2% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 120 Parallax 111 88% 113 fps	MRender 87.9 Gravity 117 Splatting 105 85% 103 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84 21,990 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 41 46 56 53 41 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.8% Below average	Read 197 Write 116 Mixed 89.2 SusWrite 49.5 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 33.6 4K Mixed 13.6 66% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 22.9 49% 101 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 71%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 228GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 86 85 85 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 131 Write 180 Mixed 51.6 SusWrite 85.8 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.4 117% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G6H1 1x16GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 13.5 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 93.5 43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	165	24.5"	1280 720	AUS25A4 VG258

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,471x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,313x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,011x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	958x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	745x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	658x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	719x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	343x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $56Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	286x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	295x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	230x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16