Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 17:29
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 53%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 204
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 445
43% 353 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.6% Excellent
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 114
Parallax 102
80% 105 fps
MRender 94.2
Gravity 100
Splatting 102
81% 98.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 358 343 357 370 373 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 389
Write 361
Mixed 270
SusWrite 361
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 35.9
134% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 314
240% 325 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 104%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1TB free
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 379 381 390 398 400 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 272
Write 270
Mixed 283
SusWrite 384
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 38
113% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 161
177% 297 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 1TB-$65
359GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 227 227 232 232 231 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.3% Good
Read 261
Write 247
Mixed 209
SusWrite 228
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 26
100% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 166
131% 181 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
40GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 171 171 172 171 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 142
Write 112
Mixed 74
SusWrite 171
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT16GX3M4X2133C9 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 32.9
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3277 U3277WB
Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback