Asus Pro WS W680-ACE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 313%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 353%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics300% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive337% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS W680-ACE  (all builds)
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 04:40
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User MNG-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 73.2
1-Core 201
2-Core 393
114% 222 Pts
4-Core 767
8-Core 1,446
132% 1,107 Pts
64-Core 2,215
137% 2,215 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 108%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Asus(1043 88D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Lighting 451
Reflection 428
Parallax 452
368% 444 fps
MRender 556
Gravity 378
Splatting 268
312% 400 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 300%
Great: 305%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFK3N.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2286 2340 1841 2173 1331 1087 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 1,523
Write 2,424
Mixed 1,422
SusWrite 1,843
409% 1,803 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 286
4K Mixed 84.6
338% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 1,207
DQ Write 1,502
DQ Mixed 1,060
881% 1,256 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 337%
Great: 323%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905783-160.A00G 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
139% Outstanding
MC Read 54.9
MC Write 52.1
MC Mixed 52.5
152% 53.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 50.3
SC Mixed 30.4
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 139%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELA115 DELL P2219H
Typical Pro WS W680-ACE Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS W680-ACE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 129% - Outstanding Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback