Acer Veriton M6610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAcer Veriton M6610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M6610
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 04:37
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
60% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 156
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 230
32% 234 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1555 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.2% Below average
Lighting 44.6
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 41.8
36% 51.4 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 37.5
33% 40.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN7872
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 103 107 106 106 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.4% Average
Read 231
Write 106
Mixed 127
SusWrite 101
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 17.8
75% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 108
84% 115 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 98%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
385GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 161 178 177 178 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 165
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 171
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR1600D364L11/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.5% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 7.9
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 23.5" 1280 720 MSI3BA0 MSI G24C4
Typical Veriton M6610 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M6610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback