TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Alienware Aurora R15 AMD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 438%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 571%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics398% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive540% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora R15 AMD  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault 0KDR38
Memory59.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 19:34
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$487
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 72.6
1-Core 215
2-Core 403
119% 230 Pts
4-Core 846
8-Core 1,599
146% 1,222 Pts
64-Core 3,598
223% 3,598 Pts
Poor: 95% ↑
This bench: 116%
 Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,756
Dell(1028 5107) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.19
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
398% Outstanding
Lighting 640
Reflection 589
Parallax 741
522% 657 fps
MRender 539
Gravity 581
Splatting 313
375% 478 fps
Poor: 303% ↑
This bench: 398%
 Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PC SN810 NVMe WDC 1024GB
823GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61912523 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3890 3997 4206 3534 3415 3519 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
540% Outstanding
Read 3,348
Write 3,686
Mixed 2,814
SusWrite 3,760
768% 3,402 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 71.3
268% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 2,378
DQ Write 1,893
DQ Mixed 2,021
1,544% 2,097 MB/s
Poor: 184% ↑
This bench: 540%
 Great: 567%
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
931GB free
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3183 2915 3038 2805 1934 1226 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
417% Outstanding
Read 3226
Write 2,940
Mixed 2,287
SusWrite 2,517
616% 2,742 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 55
187% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,938
DQ Write 1,526
DQ Mixed 1,709
1,285% 1,724 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑
This bench: 417%
 Great: 537%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
769GB free
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 414 408 401 416 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 377
Write 445
Mixed 358
SusWrite 396
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 14.3
48% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 158
172% 287 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 69.6%
 Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MTC16C2085S1UC48BA1 802C0000802C MTC16C2085S1UC48B@1 63GB
4800, 4800 MHz
32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
153% Outstanding
MC Read 62.6
MC Write 50.3
MC Mixed 56
161% 56.3 GB/s
SC Read 47.4
SC Write 52.1
SC Mixed 40.3
133% 46.6 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 149% ↑
This bench: 153%
 Great: 153%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 HEC0030 HISENSE
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Aurora R15 AMD Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R15 AMD

CPU
Ryzen 9 7950XAMD  $487Bench 114%, 3,143 samples14x
Ryzen 9 7900XAMD  $337Bench 113%, 4,545 samples7x
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD  $219Bench 112%, 4,548 samples5x
GPU
RTX 4090Nvidia  $1,756Bench 370%, 25,956 samples12x
RTX 4080Nvidia  $970Bench 290%, 22,998 samples10x
RTX 4070Nvidia  $549Bench 190%, 45,585 samples2x
SSD
SN810 NVMe WDC 1024GBPCBench 381%, 784 samples6x
NVMe KIOXIA 1024GBKxg80znv1t02Bench 328%, 450 samples5x
NVMe SK hynix 1TBPc801Bench 322%, 1,371 samples3x
RAM
MTC8C1084S1UC48BA1 2x16GBUnknownBench 141%, 526 samples8x
MTC16C2085S1UC48BA1 2x31.5GBUnknownBench 144%, 150 samples2x
HMCG78AEBUA081N 2x16GBUnknownBench 148%, 85 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $2,242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback