MSI Z77A-G43 (MS-7758)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7758
MotherboardMSI Z77A-G43 (MS-7758)  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 16:35
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 181
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 471
49% 395 Pts
64-Core 489
30% 489 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 8484) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.3% Poor
Lighting 28.7
Reflection 31
Parallax 36.6
23% 32.1 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 31.1
29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 438
Write 428
Mixed 398
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 47.5
151% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 272
218% 308 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
415GB free
Firmware: SC60
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 127
Write 128
Mixed 62
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 100%
Generic Flash Disk 1GB
0GB free, PID 7777
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9.2
Write 3.2
Mixed 4.2
6% 5.53 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-032.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14.2
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 13.8
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 13 60 27" 1920 1080 HSD0000 HL274HPB PLUS
Typical Z77A-G43 (MS-7758) Builds (Compare 1,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-G43 (MS-7758)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback