Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asrock 970A-G/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160112
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '23 at 14:09
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 70.3 2-Core 143 59% 98.1 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 365 38% 305 Pts	64-Core 378 23% 378 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Lighting 135 Reflection 216 Parallax 133 110% 161 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 140 Splatting 122 104% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 260GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 367 429 240 235 240 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 444 Write 445 Mixed 380 SusWrite 283 87% 388 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 72.3 4K Mixed 35.5 122% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 262 196% 261 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 99%
Kingston SNVS2000G 2TB 7,135 User benchmarks, average bench 187% 2TB free Firmware: S8442105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 842 1017 1059 1058 1055 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	162% Outstanding	Read 1,164 Write 1053 Mixed 848 SusWrite 901 223% 992 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 96.5 4K Mixed 22.3 139% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 551 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 468 346% 461 MB/s
Poor: 120% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 255%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-8GBNT Kingston 99U5471-039.A00LF CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Kingston 9905471-079.A00LF 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.7% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 15 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 12.5 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	72	60	75	21.7"	1280 720	GSM5B34 MP59G

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	112x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	112x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	18x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	80x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	16x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	4x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 27%, 2,515 samples	34x
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 9,944 samples	20x
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $269

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16