TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 6 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '23 at 21:21
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 144
59% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 324
33% 268 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 59.5%
 Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 195
Parallax 117
102% 146 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 138
Splatting 120
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 387 416 238 239 240 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 425
Write 237
Mixed 208
SusWrite 290
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 34.1
113% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 254
187% 244 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 80.6%
 Great: 99%
Kingston SNVS2000G 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: S8442105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 881 1015 1065 1058 1062 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,203
Write 1074
Mixed 851
SusWrite 923
228% 1,013 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 20.1
134% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 531
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 468
344% 455 MB/s
Poor: 120% ↑
This bench: 163%
 Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-8GBNT Kingston 99U5471-039.A00LF CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Kingston 9905471-079.A00LF 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.9% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 43.9%
 Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 75 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B34 MP59G
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

CPU
FX-8350AMD  $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples112x
FX-6300AMD  $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples112x
FX-8320AMD  $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples18x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples80x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples16x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples5x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung  $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples4x
RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 27%, 2,515 samples34x
RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 9,944 samples20x
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples9x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $265
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback