HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-xd0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive362% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-xd0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BCD
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 01:59
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 73.3
1-Core 190
2-Core 386
111% 216 Pts
4-Core 698
8-Core 1,234
116% 966 Pts
64-Core 1,560
96% 1,560 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
HP(103C 8BCD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
114% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 154
Parallax 140
120% 147 fps
MRender 215
Gravity 118
Splatting 94.9
111% 142 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCPNRY-1T00-1006 1TB
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2264 2277 2307 2365 2367 2394 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
362% Outstanding
Read 2,885
Write 2,091
Mixed 1,980
SusWrite 2,329
521% 2,321 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 65.4
228% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,116
DQ Write 394
DQ Mixed 840
598% 784 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 362%
Great: 533%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CWMOD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 50.1
MC Write 47.1
MC Mixed 42.6
133% 46.6 GB/s
SC Read 45.9
SC Write 55.7
SC Mixed 50.3
145% 50.6 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 132%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 144 16" 1280 720 BOE0B9F
Typical OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-xd0xxx Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

System: HP OMEN by HP Gaming Laptop 16-xd0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback