HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84DA
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 00:03
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 210
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 541
57% 455 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 84DA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6345
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 7.1
6% 7.57 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 10.8
8% 9.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 84DA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Lighting 31.2
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 35.8
25% 32.8 fps
MRender 34.7
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 20.7
23% 29.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
237GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 897 860 843 818 775 669 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1802
Write 1,670
Mixed 1,572
SusWrite 810
328% 1,464 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 54
180% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 825
DQ Write 568
DQ Mixed 705
524% 699 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 208%
Great: 346%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
765GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 130 134 132 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 125
Write 125
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 132
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.3
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 24.2
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 20 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E7
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx Builds (Compare 3,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback