Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_R1502ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_R1502ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1502ZA
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 13:33
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 63.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 240
77% 144 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 693
67% 550 Pts
64-Core 884
55% 884 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1D52) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 20.2
14% 19.4 fps
MRender 17.8
Gravity 23
Splatting 14.7
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 56 303 264 78 180 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 780
Write 511
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 152
82% 373 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 12.2
82% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 19.8
39% 85 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.2% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 25.9
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 21.3
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0903
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_R1502ZA Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1502ZA_R1502ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback