HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory12.8 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110714
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 13:31
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 660
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 141
54% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 187
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 625
Asus(1043 844C) 2GB
CLim: 873 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3
Parallax 0.6
2% 2 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 216 217 212 220 224 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
73.7% Very good
Read 236
Write 228
Mixed 225
SusWrite 218
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 41
135% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 197
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 52GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 22" 1280 720 SAM044C SyncMaster
Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback