Asus X542UR

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus X542UR (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X542UR
Memory	8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190522
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '23 at 06:30
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7500U VH 2,074 User benchmarks, average bench 52% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Memory 77.3 1-Core 99 2-Core 186 69% 121 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 277 37% 276 Pts	64-Core 275 17% 275 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1A00) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	3.28% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 7 5% 5.57 fps	MRender 0.2 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.2 0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.28% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 2.5 240GB 1,708 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: 42051100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 83 34 84 48 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 305 Write 168 Mixed 223 SusWrite 78.3 43% 194 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 18.8 74% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 81 DQ Mixed 51.7 64% 117 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AO1P24HC8T1-BSFS 04CB AO1P24HC4R1-BSIS 12GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.4% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 10.3 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 11.2 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	15.5"	1366 768	CMN15DB

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X542UR Builds (Compare 395 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X542UR

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	234x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	84x
Core i3-7100UIntelBench 43%, 37,239 samples	58x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	276x
930MXNvidiaBench 8%, 7,330 samples	110x
HD Graphics 510IntelBench 2%, 6,504 samples	8x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	10x

RAM
AO1P24HC8T1-BSFS 1x8GBAdataBench 36%, 6,338 samples	85x
AO1P24HC4R1-BSIS 1x4GBAdataBench 38%, 759 samples	54x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16