Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z170-HD3P
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20180309
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '23 at 06:27
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 79 1-Core 99.6 2-Core 179 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 423 46% 365 Pts	64-Core 406 25% 406 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$240 72,499 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Nvidia(10DE 2507) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	74.1% Very good	Lighting 101 Reflection 82.4 Parallax 87.7 82% 90.3 fps	MRender 83.7 Gravity 70.8 Splatting 63.4 58% 72.6 fps
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 79%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 418 Write 291 Mixed 348 78% 352 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 38.7 128% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 356 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate One Touch w/PW 2TB 250 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 808GB free Firmware: 1708 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 85.7 Write 98.9 Mixed 84.2 67% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.3 81% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 318GB free Firmware: CC43 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 162 Write 157 Mixed 69.6 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-074.A00G 2x16GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 23.6 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 25.9 SC Mixed 19.6 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 82.4 48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	42	8	60	23.7"	1920 1009	XMI23C3 Mi Monitor

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z170-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 2,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P - $113

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	821x
Core i5-6600KIntel $64Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	559x
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	306x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	276x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	265x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	242x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	146x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	77x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	56x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	104x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	90x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	76x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $544

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16