Dell Latitude E5570

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Latitude E5570  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0N98Y6
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 640 x 480 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190520
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 00:59
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 168
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 454
46% 372 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Dell(1028 06DF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1338
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.69% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 7.1
5% 7.07 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G-1001 512GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10160101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,712
Write 1,634
Mixed 1,487
359% 1,611 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 49.8
160% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 619
431% 547 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 264%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MD-8 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 22.6
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15C5
Typical Latitude E5570 Builds (Compare 2,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E5570

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback