Supermicro C7Z170-SQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemSupermicro C7Z170-SQ  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C7Z170-SQ
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 22:38
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 216
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 593
61% 491 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
MSI(1462 3721) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 178
Parallax 180
137% 176 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 160
Splatting 135
128% 160 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 487
Write 448
Mixed 358
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 41.3
136% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 315
239% 321 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
172GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 423 440 441 322 322 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 454
Mixed 421
SusWrite 394
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 43.8
142% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 318
240% 323 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 95 93 99 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 71
Write 65.3
Mixed 42.1
SusWrite 95.1
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 84%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
326GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 134 134 135 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 165
Write 177
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 134
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86%
Great: 112%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 231 229 231 233 223 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 235
Write 216
Mixed 102
SusWrite 229
143% 195 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.8
361% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 133%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 27.3
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 27.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 72.3" 1920 1080 SNYD603 SONY TV
Typical C7Z170-SQ Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Supermicro C7Z170-SQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback