Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD7

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD7 (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '23 at 22:36
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 K 875-$180 2,354 User benchmarks, average bench 70% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 94.2 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 180 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 456 47% 381 Pts	64-Core 462 29% 462 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 04C2) CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Lighting 61.3 Reflection 60.7 Parallax 82.2 50% 68.1 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 67.6 Splatting 45 46% 57.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 332GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 90 92 92 93 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.8% Average	Read 278 Write 145 Mixed 190 SusWrite 90.6 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 27 87% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 32.5 DQ Write 46.3 DQ Mixed 37.5 29% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 478GB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 93 93 94 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Read 294 Write 150 Mixed 184 SusWrite 93.1 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 26.9 88% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 33.5 DQ Write 47.7 DQ Mixed 31.5 26% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 137%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.6% Average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 15.1 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 14.6 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 57.4 70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	59	75	23.5"	1920 1027	PHLC17E PHL 248E9Q

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55A-UD7 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD7

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	4x
Core i7 K 875Intel $180Bench 70%, 2,354 samples	2x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	2x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	3x
HD 5750AMDBench 8%, 12,403 samples	1x
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	1x
470 Series SSD 256GBSamsungBench 43%, 462 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	3x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	3x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $341

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16