Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics87.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 22:08
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 183
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 309
37% 285 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 854F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1556 MHz, MLim: 1875 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 128
Parallax 113
88% 116 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 108
Splatting 99.1
85% 105 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 451
Write 377
Mixed 343
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 34.4
135% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 201
172% 252 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
198GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 94 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 62
SusWrite 93.4
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMD8GX3M2A1600C9 0420 F3-12800CL10-8GBXL 0215 CMD8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1920 1080 VSC0523 VA2223wm
Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $623
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback