Dell Precision T1600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Dell Precision T1600
Motherboard	Dell Precision T1600 (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180705
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '23 at 20:51
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31225 3,353 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 84.1 2-Core 165 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 278 33% 256 Pts	64-Core 272 17% 272 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.1% Average	Lighting 62.2 Reflection 68.1 Parallax 60.9 51% 63.7 fps	MRender 67.8 Gravity 63.2 Splatting 0.1 31% 43.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 8,981 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 120 101 57 151 163 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 119 Write 101 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 108 73% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 184%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 202GB free Firmware: GM4OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 75 75 76 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 73.8 Write 75 Mixed 42.6 SusWrite 74.8 49% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 16GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	49.8% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.9 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 15.4 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	23.5"	1280 720	AOC2450 2450W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T1600 Builds (Compare 568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1600

CPU
Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples	196x
Xeon E3-1245IntelBench 70%, 3,302 samples	161x
Xeon E31270IntelBench 71%, 3,539 samples	96x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	52x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	46x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	9x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	9x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 1,553 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48