Gigabyte GA-U4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemGIGABYTE RC14UD
MotherboardGigabyte GA-U4  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210501
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 19:02
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-1155G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 73
1-Core 121
2-Core 189
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 374
43% 333 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Clevo(1558 14A1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.69% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 12.9
8% 13.2 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 10.3
10% 13 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.69%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESR512GTLCW-E6GBTNB4 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM15.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 757 875 677 345 343 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 998
Write 1,215
Mixed 1,062
SusWrite 557
216% 958 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 53.9
183% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 442
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 378
263% 335 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 145%
Great: 343%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 24.2
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 15.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 29 60 14" 1280 720 AUO623D
Typical GA-U4 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-U4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback