Asrock A520M-HVS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime25.2 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 14:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 76.1
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 838
86% 692 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 125
54% 89.2 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 33.1
55% 72.3 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 1TB
754GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09273 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2164 2081 2086 2127 1344 1236 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,138
Write 1,592
Mixed 1,903
SusWrite 1,839
420% 1,868 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 33.2
116% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,252
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 580
532% 830 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 276%
Great: 520%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U320016G16A-BB10 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 15.6
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 165 27" 1280 720 CMS2700 CM24C8
Typical A520M-HVS Builds (Compare 543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback