Asrock A520M-HVS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A520M-HVS  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '23 at 09:58
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 72.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 261
79% 149 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 860
86% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,106
68% 1,106 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.1% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 74.2
Parallax 121
53% 86.5 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 32.8
54% 70.6 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 1TB
888GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09273 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,164
Write 2,256
Mixed 1,978
477% 2,133 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 67.9
223% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,247
DQ Write 718
DQ Mixed 931
707% 965 MB/s
Poor: 167% Great: 520%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U320016G16A-BB10 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 31.5" 1280 720 MSI3DB4 MSI AG321CR
Typical A520M-HVS Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M-HVS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback