Acer Aspire XC-895

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-895  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-895
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210621
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 11:33
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$126
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 763
77% 626 Pts
64-Core 924
57% 924 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 142C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.8% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 7.4
5% 7.5 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 10.7
7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.8%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1260 1280 290 257 249 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,584
Write 1,856
Mixed 1,621
SusWrite 588
318% 1,412 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 65.2
213% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 703
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 577
438% 595 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 193%
Great: 295%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
580GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 437 469 466 469 470 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 472
Mixed 425
SusWrite 452
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 48.4
158% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 348
262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 113%
Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
498GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 141 157 154 156 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 170
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 149
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2P32NC8W1-BCFS 859B CT8G4DFRA32A.M4FF 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.1% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 14.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 19.2
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 DEL41F1 DELL S2421HN
Typical Aspire XC-895 Builds (Compare 374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-895

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $126
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback