Lenovo 83AU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83AU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 10:46
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 65.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 242
79% 146 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 761
76% 618 Pts
64-Core 884
55% 884 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RadeonT 660M
Legend(17AA 381F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.46.02
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 34.3
15% 26.6 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 27.5
18% 21.7 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1006P7LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1201 1119 1105 1244 691 681 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,430
Write 1,234
Mixed 1,089
SusWrite 1,007
267% 1,190 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 49.1
150% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 745
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 601
416% 530 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 188%
Great: 430%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 33
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 26.3
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 90 14.5" 1280 720 LEN89C1
Typical 83AU Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 83AU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback