Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170802
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 08:47
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 94.2
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 64.6
50% 69.7 Pts
4-Core 93.6
8-Core 141
15% 117 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48% Average
Lighting 59
Reflection 68
Parallax 60.3
48% 62.4 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 53.4
48% 59.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 198 234 248 257 275 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 354
Write 282
Mixed 262
SusWrite 235
64% 283 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 21.7
76% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 216
153% 193 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
662GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 149 151 152 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 171
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 147
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.1
194% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
659GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 150 155 159 161 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 117
Write 73.3
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 155
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-2133C9-4GXL 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.6% Poor
MC Read 15
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 10.5
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 40 8 60 27" 1280 720 MSI3CA6 MSI MAG272CQR
Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback