Adata XENIAXe15TI5G11GXELX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAdata XENIAXe15TI5G11GXELX  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel LAPBC510
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210518
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 21:36
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 43.9
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 80.8
36% 58.8 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 302
27% 229 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Intel(8086 2097) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 22.5
18% 22.4 fps
MRender 18.5
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 14.4
15% 19.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S50 Lite 1TB
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 82A7T9PA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 744 823 907 733 666 659 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 909
Write 564
Mixed 593
SusWrite 755
158% 705 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 30.4
96% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 281
203% 268 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 124%
Great: 458%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E512M32D2NP-046 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 46.8
MC Mixed 31.9
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 4.5
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE08F5
Typical XENIAXe15TI5G11GXELX Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Adata XENIAXe15TI5G11GXELX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback