Asus Z10PA-D8 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Z10PA-D8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PA-D8 Series
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 20:53
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 182
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 677
61% 513 Pts
64-Core 1,429
88% 1,429 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 189
Parallax 181
140% 181 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 176
Splatting 122
116% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFM512GD3HX015N 512GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41030C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 308 332 335 335 336 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 370
Write 330
Mixed 338
SusWrite 327
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 52.4
168% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 452
313% 388 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 103%
Great: 281%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
149GB free
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 85 138 128 125 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 446
Write 352
Mixed 214
SusWrite 149
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 18.5
73% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 87.7
DQ Mixed 13.7
34% 73.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 56%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
296GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 96 97 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 125
Write 137
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 96.7
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 74%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
145GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 83 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 70.1
Write 69.4
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 82.9
46% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7
10GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
43% Average
Read 249
Write 19.2
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 19.3
66% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 43%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 M393A1G40DB0-CPB M393A1G40DB0-CPB Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
MC Read 51
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 37.8
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 100 34.1" 1280 720 ACI3433 ROG PG348Q
Typical Z10PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PA-D8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback